From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Blount

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 21, 1991
571 N.E.2d 78 (N.Y. 1991)

Summary

In People v Blount (77 N.Y.2d 888, affg 159 A.D.2d 579), this Court held that precluding a defendant from consulting with his attorney during an overnight recess violated the right to the assistance of counsel.

Summary of this case from People v. Joseph

Opinion

Argued February 8, 1991

Decided March 21, 1991

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Herbert J. Lipp, J.

Denis Dillon, District Attorney (Alexis Kriedman and Bruce E. Whitney of counsel), for appellant.

Kent V. Moston, Carol Lewisohn and Matthew Muraskin for respondent.


Order affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 159 A.D.2d 579).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

People v. Blount

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 21, 1991
571 N.E.2d 78 (N.Y. 1991)

In People v Blount (77 N.Y.2d 888, affg 159 A.D.2d 579), this Court held that precluding a defendant from consulting with his attorney during an overnight recess violated the right to the assistance of counsel.

Summary of this case from People v. Joseph
Case details for

People v. Blount

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. STEVEN BLOUNT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 21, 1991

Citations

571 N.E.2d 78 (N.Y. 1991)
571 N.E.2d 78
568 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

People v. Umali

( People v Liner, 9 NY3d 856; People v Angelo, 88 NY2d 217; People v Pacer, 6 NY3d 504; People v Robinson, 74…

People v. Schiliro

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court's admonition did not violate his constitutional right to…