Opinion
2015-07-22
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jamar BETHUNE, appellant.
Ryan G. Blanch, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Jodi L. Mandel, and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel), for respondent.
Ryan G. Blanch, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Jodi L. Mandel, and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered June 16, 2009, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the court's supplemental charge explaining that the initial verdict was repugnant and defining murder in the second degree was improper. However, the trial transcript has since been properly resettled to reflect that the challenged portions of the charge represented transcription errors ( see People v. Santorelli, 95 N.Y.2d 412, 424, 718 N.Y.S.2d 696, 741 N.E.2d 493; People v. Williams, 2 A.D.3d 546, 767 N.Y.S.2d 877; People v. Scott, 197 A.D.2d 646, 647, 602 N.Y.S.2d 684; cf. People v. Laracuente, 136 A.D.2d 742, 744, 524 N.Y.S.2d 82).
The defendant also contends that his conviction of murder in the second degree was against the weight of the evidence. In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence ( seeCPL 470.15 [5]; People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor ( see People v. Mateo, 2 N.Y.3d 383, 410, 779 N.Y.S.2d 399, 811 N.E.2d 1053; People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt as to that count was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902).