From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bernard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1998
255 A.D.2d 330 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The decision of whether to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the sentencing court ( see, People v. Brooks, 183 A.D.2d 722; People v. Howard, 138 A.D.2d 525). Here, the sentencing court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. The court held a hearing at which both the defendant and prior counsel testified. The court discredited the defendant's testimony that prior counsel had assured him that if he entered a plea of guilty, he would "be home in December of 1996 on work release" and credited prior counsel's testimony which denied the defendant's assertion. It is settled that issues of credibility are primarily for the hearing court and its findings should be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous ( see, People v. Lewis, 170 A.D.2d 538; People v. Armstead, 98 A.D.2d 726).

The defendant's remaining contention is not properly before this Court.

Mangano, P. J., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bernard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1998
255 A.D.2d 330 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Bernard

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALEXANDER BERNARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 2, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 330 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 330

Citing Cases

People v. Stephens

Following the second remittal, which we directed was to be before a different justice, the court denied…

People v. Stephens

The court then denied the motion. Contrary to the contention of defendant, his former counsel was properly…