Opinion
2168
November 12, 2002.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.), rendered November 24, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 2 to 6 years and 1 to 3 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
ARGIRO KOSMETATOS, for respondent.
BERTRAND J. KAHN, for defendant-appellant.
Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Marlow, JJ.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of identification and credibility, including the question of defendant's opportunity to separate himself from prerecorded buy money and additional drugs, were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations (see People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94). We note that defendant — arrested moments after the crime and standing alone at the crime scene — matched a very specific description provided by the undercover officer.
The fact that defendant was convicted of both criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree does not violate the prohibition against double jeopardy (see Missouri v. Hunter, 459 U.S. 359, 368-369). We decline to invoke our interest of justice jurisdiction to dismiss the non-inclusory concurrent count (see People v. Spence, 290 A.D.2d 223, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 641; People v. Kulakov, 278 A.D.2d 519, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 785).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.