From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bennett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 9, 1998
252 A.D.2d 369 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

July 9, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Elbert Hinkson, J.).


Defendant's claim of insufficiency of the evidence before the Grand Jury is not reviewable on appeal since the judgment of conviction was based upon legally sufficient trial evidence (CPL 210.30). Furthermore, there is no basis for finding that the integrity of the Grand Jury proceedings was impaired. The certifications on the laboratory reports questioned by defendant rendered the reports self-authenticating and admissible before the Grand Jury since each contained a statement, made under penalty of perjury, that the report was a true and full copy of the original "made by me" ( Matter of Deshone C., 207 A.D.2d 756, lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 801).

With respect to the issue of whether or not defendant was present at sidebar conferences during the jury voir dire, a review of the minutes of the reconstruction hearing, previously directed by this Court ( People v. Bennett, 238 A.D.2d 138) indicates that defendant met his burden of proving his absence at such conferences by a preponderance of the evidence ( People v. Childs, 247 A.D.2d 319). However, such minutes also indicate that defendant discussed the jury voir dire proceedings with his counsel and authorized his counsel to make all necessary decisions in connection with selection of jurors. That testimony, together with defendant's consent stated on the trial record, satisfactorily indicates that defendant entered a knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver of his right to be present at sidebar conferences during the jury voir dire, with the understanding that he would be permitted to be present if his counsel so requested ( see, People v. Irving, 234 A.D.2d 31, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 924; People v. Patterson, 227 A.D.2d 348, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 991). The totality of the record of the trial, and reconstruction hearing establishes that defendant delegated to counsel the authority to determine whether defendant's presence would be necessary for any particular sidebar conference.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Tom and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Bennett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 9, 1998
252 A.D.2d 369 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEAFORD BENNETT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 9, 1998

Citations

252 A.D.2d 369 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
676 N.Y.S.2d 60

Citing Cases

People v. Nicholas

Were we to review this claim, we would find that the laboratory reports in question, each of which bore a…

People v. Allen

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.…