From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Benavides

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 2, 2005
19 A.D.3d 134 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

6233.

June 2, 2005.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered November 13, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 14 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the DNA databank fee, and otherwise affirmed.

Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Sara Gurwitch of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (T. Charles Won of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal, and this waiver encompassed his excessive sentence claim ( People v. Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733). In any event, were we to find that defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal, we would perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

As the People concede, since the crime was committed before the effective date of the legislation (Penal Law § 60.35 [a] [v] [former (1) (e)]) providing for the imposition of a DNA databank fee, that fee should not have been imposed. Since this issue involves the substantive legality of the sentence, it survives defendant's waiver of his right to appeal.


Summaries of

People v. Benavides

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 2, 2005
19 A.D.3d 134 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Benavides

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID BENAVIDES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 2, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 134 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
795 N.Y.S.2d 585

Citing Cases

People v. Manning

On appeal, defendant argues that, because he was not convicted of one of the “designated offenses” set forth…

People v. Harris

Although defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the court erred in imposing a $50…