From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bellissimo

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. SECOND DEPARTMENT
Dec 3, 2009
25 Misc. 3d 141 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)

Summary

In People v Bellissimo (25 Misc 3d 141[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 52463[U]), we concluded, among other things, that the Justice Court erred in summarily denying the suppression branches of defendant's omnibus motion on the ground that the motion was untimely.

Summary of this case from People v. Bellissimo

Opinion

December 3, 2009.


Crimes — Pretrial Motions — Timeliness of Motions. Criminal Procedure Law — § 255.20 (1) (Pretrial motions; procedure).


Summaries of

People v. Bellissimo

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. SECOND DEPARTMENT
Dec 3, 2009
25 Misc. 3d 141 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)

In People v Bellissimo (25 Misc 3d 141[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 52463[U]), we concluded, among other things, that the Justice Court erred in summarily denying the suppression branches of defendant's omnibus motion on the ground that the motion was untimely.

Summary of this case from People v. Bellissimo
Case details for

People v. Bellissimo

Case Details

Full title:People v. Bellissimo (Paul)

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. SECOND DEPARTMENT

Date published: Dec 3, 2009

Citations

25 Misc. 3d 141 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52463

Citing Cases

People v. M. Santulli, LLC

The merits of the speedy trial motion are not properly before this court in the current procedural posture of…

People v. M. Santulli, LLC

The merits of the speedy trial motion are not properly before this court in the current procedural posture of…