From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bellia

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 5, 1962
182 N.E.2d 283 (N.Y. 1962)

Opinion

Argued April 2, 1962

Decided April 5, 1962

Appeal from the County Court of Erie County, ROBERT W. MARSHLOW, J.

Carman F. Ball, District Attorney ( John M. Frysiak of counsel), for appellant.

Joseph M. Ralabate for respondent.


It is our conclusion, from examination of the record before us, that the defendant — although served with a summons a short time thereafter — had been arrested shortly before blood was taken from her body. In this view, it is unnecessary to decide whether, in order that its results be admissible in a prosecution for driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1192, subd. 2 [formerly § 70, subd. 5]), the blood test provided for in subdivision 3 of section 1192 must be taken after a defendant's arrest.

We have also considered the other contentions advanced by the defendant and find them without merit.

The order of the Erie County Court should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER concur.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Bellia

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 5, 1962
182 N.E.2d 283 (N.Y. 1962)
Case details for

People v. Bellia

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. MARY BELLIA, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 5, 1962

Citations

182 N.E.2d 283 (N.Y. 1962)
182 N.E.2d 283
227 N.Y.S.2d 674

Citing Cases

People v. O'Donnell

Not only was the test administered within two hours following the arrest by the Sheriff, but the defendant…