From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bell

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 25, 2015
126 A.D.3d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

03-25-2015

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Reginald BELL, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jonathan M. Kratter of counsel), for appellant. Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Paul M. Tarr of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jonathan M. Kratter of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Paul M. Tarr of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered January 4, 2012, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of a fair trial due to certain comments the prosecutor made on summation is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2] ), because the defendant failed to object to the comments he now challenges (see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 911, 912, 828 N.Y.S.2d 274, 861 N.E.2d 89 ), or failed to request additional relief when the trial court sustained objections or provided curative instructions (see People v.

Heide, 84 N.Y.2d 943, 944, 620 N.Y.S.2d 814, 644 N.E.2d 1370 ; People v. Bajana, 82 A.D.3d 1111, 1112, 919 N.Y.S.2d 194 ; People v. Damon, 78 A.D.3d 860, 861, 911 N.Y.S.2d 127 ). In any event, the comments did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see People v. Jorgensen, 113 A.D.3d 793, 794, 978 N.Y.S.2d 361 ; People v. Littlejohn, 112 A.D.3d 67, 77, 974 N.Y.S.2d 77 ).

BALKIN, J.P., ROMAN, SGROI and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bell

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 25, 2015
126 A.D.3d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Reginald BELL, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 25, 2015

Citations

126 A.D.3d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
126 A.D.3d 993
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 2491

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

05[2]; People v. Charles, 57 A.D.3d 556, 869 N.Y.S.2d 564). In any event, with the exception of one comment,…

People v. Thomas

In any event, with the exception of one comment, the remarks were either fair comment on the evidence or…