From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Beaudoin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 1993
195 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 16, 1993

Appeal from the Jefferson County Court, Clary, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Lawton, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Jefferson County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: In ordering defendant to make restitution, the court did not determine the exact amount to be paid, but only set a ceiling of $22,000, with the exact amount to be fixed at a later date. When a court orders restitution, it must specifically set forth what amount is to be paid (People v. Fuller, 57 N.Y.2d 152, 158; People v. Sommer, 105 A.D.2d 1052; People v. Ramirez, 98 A.D.2d 985; see also, Penal Law § 60.27, 65.10 Penal [2] [g]). The duty to make such findings may not be delegated to the Probation Department (People v. Fuller, supra, at 155, 158-159; People v De Berry, 117 A.D.2d 1006). There are not sufficient facts in the record to make a determination and, therefore, we vacate the amount of restitution and remit this matter for a hearing to determine the amount of restitution to be paid by defendant (see, People v. Guise, 179 A.D.2d 1027, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 1001; People v. Sommer, supra; People v. Ramirez, supra).

We have examined defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Beaudoin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 1993
195 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Beaudoin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICKY BEAUDOIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 16, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 558

Citing Cases

People v. Stone

Lastly, as the People concede, County Court erred in directing defendant to pay restitution without first…

People v. Spry

Thus, there was a lack of compliance with Penal Law § 60.27 (2) since there was no express consent to, or…