From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 9, 1994
204 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 9, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Although the defendant now contends that he did not understand the nature of the crime to which he was pleading guilty, he admitted on the record at the plea proceeding that he forcibly compelled the victim to have sexual intercourse with him, by holding her down with his body, and that he knew it was illegal to have sexual intercourse with anyone in that manner. The defendant offered his plea after being advised by the court of his rights to trial by jury, to confront and cross examine adverse witnesses, to present witnesses on his own behalf, to remain silent, and to be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. We find that his plea was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Lawrence, Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 9, 1994
204 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Bates

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANDREW S. BATES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 9, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 163

Citing Cases

People v. Jones

A motion to withdraw a guilty plea is addressed to the sound discretion of the court (see, People v Evans,…