From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bassik

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 11, 1981
425 N.E.2d 873 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Argued May 8, 1981

Decided June 11, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, EDWARD A. BAKER, J.

Edward M. Chikofsky for appellant.

Denis Dillon, District Attorney (Judith R. Sternberg and William C. Donnino of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The trial court did not err in refusing defendant's request to have the jury instructed concerning the possibility of his being civilly committed if found not guilty by reason of insanity. At the time of this trial it was well settled that the defendant was not entitled to such a charge (People v Adams, 26 N.Y.2d 129, 138). The legislative change in this rule (CPL 300.10, subd 3) did not go into effect until September 1, 1980 (L 1980, ch 548), after this trial had concluded.

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Bassik

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 11, 1981
425 N.E.2d 873 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

People v. Bassik

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD BASSIK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 11, 1981

Citations

425 N.E.2d 873 (N.Y. 1981)
425 N.E.2d 873
442 N.Y.S.2d 485

Citing Cases

Bassik v. Scully

The New York Court of Appeals issued an opinion stating that the amendment to the statute had no bearing on…

State v. Becker

.2d at 1035–36 (noting that, under common law rules, Connecticut courts did not require the instruction, see…