From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Barry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 7, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendant a four-week, rather than an approximately seven-week, continuance due to the illness of defense counsel's husband (see, People v. Arroyave, 49 N.Y.2d 264; People v. Gelo, 32 A.D.2d 661).

The defendant's contention that the sentence is excessive is without merit (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Sullivan and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Barry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Barry

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN BARRY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 440