From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Barry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 16, 2017
150 A.D.3d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

05-16-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hamadou BARRY, Defendant–Appellant.

Galluzzo & Arnone LLP, New York (Matthew Galluzzo of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Julia P. Cohen of counsel), for respondent.


Galluzzo & Arnone LLP, New York (Matthew Galluzzo of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Julia P. Cohen of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), rendered September 10, 2015, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of forcible touching, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The record supports the court's determination that, notwithstanding an unduly suggestive lineup, the victim had an independent source for an in-court identification of defendant (see Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199–200, 93 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 [1972] ; People v. Williams, 222 A.D.2d 149, 153, 646 N.Y.S.2d 665 [1st Dept.1996], lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 1072, 651 N.Y.S.2d 416, 674 N.E.2d 346 [1996] ). The victim recognized defendant as someone she had encountered numerous times in the area of her work over the course of approximately two years, and she had ample opportunity to view her assailant during the crime, for a period of minutes under good lighting conditions.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., RICHTER, MOSKOWITZ, GISCHE, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Barry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 16, 2017
150 A.D.3d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Barry

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hamadou BARRY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 16, 2017

Citations

150 A.D.3d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
52 N.Y.S.3d 224