Opinion
March 6, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that it was error for the court to have permitted into evidence the complainant's out-of-court statements that the defendant raped her is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Bacchus, 175 A.D.2d 248; People v. Alston, 163 A.D.2d 398). In any event, the testimony complained of on appeal was properly admitted as evidence of the complainant's "prompt outcry" that she had been raped (see generally, People v. McDaniel, 81 N.Y.2d 10; People v Rice, 75 N.Y.2d 929). Rosenblatt, J.P., Lawrence, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.