From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Barcliff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 2005
18 A.D.3d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2002-01572.

May 16, 2005.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers, J.), rendered February 7, 2002, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he could have been convicted only of intentional murder ( see Penal Law § 125.25), and that the evidence was legally insufficient to support a conviction of depraved indifference murder ( see Penal Law § 125.25; People v. Payne, 3 NY3d 266) is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see CPL 470.15 [c], [6] [a]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Barcliff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 2005
18 A.D.3d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Barcliff

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEE BARCLIFF, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 16, 2005

Citations

18 A.D.3d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
794 N.Y.S.2d 682

Citing Cases

People v. Scott

25; People v. Payne, 3 NY3d 266) is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86…

Barcliff v. Smith

The Second Department concluded that Barcliff's legal insufficiency claim was "unpreserved for appellate…