From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Baez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 16, 1998
251 A.D.2d 170 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 16, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J.).


The court's instruction on the nature of the jury's deliberation process was sufficiently balanced and was not coercive ( see, People v. Alvarez, 86 N.Y.2d 761; People v. Ford, 78 N.Y.2d 878).

Defendants challenge to the court's charge on the impact of his prior conviction upon his credibility is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the instruction, as a whole, conveyed the proper standard.

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Wallach and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Baez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 16, 1998
251 A.D.2d 170 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Baez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BRANDON BAEZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 170 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 908