From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ashdown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 24, 2021
195 A.D.3d 1325 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

528977

06-24-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Thomas ASHDOWN, Appellant.

Linda B. Johnson, East Greenbush, for appellant. Mary Pat Donnelly, District Attorney, Troy (George J. Hoffman Jr. of counsel), for respondent.


Linda B. Johnson, East Greenbush, for appellant.

Mary Pat Donnelly, District Attorney, Troy (George J. Hoffman Jr. of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Aarons and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Clark, J.

Appeal from a decision of the County Court of Rensselaer County (Sober, J.), dated October 3, 2018, which denied defendant's application pursuant to Correction Law § 168–o (2) for reclassification of his sex offender risk level status.

In 1993, defendant pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of attempted sodomy in the first degree and was sentenced to 1 to 3 years in prison. Following his release from prison, defendant was classified as a risk level three sex offender. In 2016, defendant successfully moved to modify his risk level classification from a risk level three to a risk level two, pursuant to Correction Law § 168–o (2). In 2018, defendant petitioned for a further modification of his risk level classification to a risk level one, which was opposed by the People. Following a hearing, County Court denied defendant's request. Defendant appeals.

Defendant's petition for modification and the People's opposition to the petition incorrectly indicate that defendant pleaded guilty to sodomy in the first degree and that he was sentenced to three years in prison.

Correction Law § 168–o (4) requires that, in determining a modification petition, County Court "render an order setting forth its determination, and the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which the determination is based" (see Correction Law § 168–n [3] ). Such order must "be in writing" ( CPLR 2219[a] ) and "entered and filed in the office of the clerk of the court where the action is triable" ( CPLR 2220[a] ; see People v. West, 193 A.D.3d 1127, 1127, 145 N.Y.S.3d 669 [2021] ). The record does not reflect that any order was ever issued or entered and filed. Absent an order by the court, this appeal is not properly before us and must be dismissed (see CPLR 5513, 5515[1] ; People v. West, 193 A.D.3d at 1127, 145 N.Y.S.3d 669 ; see also People v. Johnson, 179 A.D.3d 1159, 1160, 113 N.Y.S.3d 618 [2020] ).

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Aarons and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

People v. Ashdown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 24, 2021
195 A.D.3d 1325 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Ashdown

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Thomas Ashdown…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 24, 2021

Citations

195 A.D.3d 1325 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 4062
146 N.Y.S.3d 537