Opinion
January 21, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the trial court erred in allowing a police officer to testify that he arrested the defendant after a conversation with the victim (see, People v Holt, 67 N.Y.2d 819, 821; see also, People v. DuBois, 137 A.D.2d 706) is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05). In any event, any error was harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt, including the strong identification testimony by the victim and an eyewitness who was acquainted with the defendant (see, People v. Mobley, 56 N.Y.2d 584; People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230). Balletta, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.