From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Angel E

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 8, 1996
233 A.D.2d 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 8, 1996.

Adjudication unanimously affirmed.

Before: Present — Pine, J.P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.


Defendant's contention that reversal is required because County Court's finding of a violation of probation is based solely on hearsay evidence is not preserved for our review ( see, People v Park, 203 AD2d 596, lv denied 84 NY2d 830), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see, CPL 470.15 [a]). (Appeal from Adjudication of Monroe County Court, Bristol, J. — Youthful Offender.)


Summaries of

People v. Angel E

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 8, 1996
233 A.D.2d 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Angel E

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANGEL E., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
649 N.Y.S.2d 878

Citing Cases

People v. Washington

We affirm. Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court improperly found,…

People v. Washington

We affirm. Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court improperly found,…