From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1990
168 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 24, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.).


Ordered that so much of the appeal as is from the sentence imposed upon the conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree is dismissed as academic; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as reviewed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, we discern no error in the trial court's limitation of cross-examination with respect to a prosecution witness. It is firmly established that the degree of control to be exercised over the nature and extent of cross-examination is a matter addressed to the sound and broad discretion of the trial court (see, People v. Schwartzman, 24 N.Y.2d 241, cert. denied 396 U.S. 846; People v. Boyajian, 148 A.D.2d 740). Inasmuch as the matters which the defendant's trial counsel sought to further explore on cross-examination in this case were largely collateral and had already been adequately covered, it cannot be said that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in precluding additional questioning with regard to these matters (see, e.g., People v. Boyajian, supra). In any event, even if it were assumed that the court's rulings were erroneous, the error would be harmless in view of the strong evidence of the defendant's guilt and the limited relevance of the testimony provided by the witness with regard to whom further cross-examination was sought (cf., People v. Mills, 146 A.D.2d 810; People v. Scoon, 130 A.D.2d 597).

The defendant's challenge to the sentence imposed on his conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, which term was made to run concurrently with the greater sentence he received on his conviction of grand larceny in the fourth degree, has been rendered academic by reason of the fact that he has already fully served the challenged sentence (see, People v. Reyes, 74 N.Y.2d 837). Accordingly, so much of his appeal as concerns the propriety of that sentence is dismissed. Eiber, J.P., Sullivan, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1990
168 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID ANDERSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

People v. King

ORDERED that appeal is dismissed as academic. The defendant's contention that the sentence imposed was…

People v. King

ORDERED that appeal is dismissed as academic.The defendant's contention that the sentence imposed was…