From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ambrozik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 20, 1984
104 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

September 20, 1984

Appeal from the County Court of Chemung County (Monroe, J.).


Upon this record, it was proper for the court to submit to the jury, as a question of fact, whether the breathalyzer test was administered to defendant within two hours of his arrest for driving while intoxicated (see People v Keane, 76 A.D.2d 963). Additionally, we do not find the concurrent sentences imposed in this case, i.e., a $500 fine and one year in the county jail on the conviction for driving with at least 10% of alcohol in his blood (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1192, subd. 2) and 60 days in the county jail on the conviction for driving while ability impaired by alcohol (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1192, subd. 1), to be harsh or excessive.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ambrozik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 20, 1984
104 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Ambrozik

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ADAM AMBROZIK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 20, 1984

Citations

104 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

We disagree with the implication of these instructions that either reasonable cause to arrest or the results…

People v. Abel

And as defendant waited until County Court had excused the jury before asking that it be polled, his untimely…