From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Amato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 29, 1984
101 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

May 29, 1984


Appeals by defendants from four judgments (one as to each defendant) of the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.), all rendered September 12, 1983, convicting defendants of promoting gambling in the first degree, upon their pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. ¶ Judgments affirmed and matters remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). ¶ Defendants, by their pleas of guilty, forfeited their right to challenge the geographical jurisdiction of Nassau County to prosecute the instant indictment (see People v Williams, 14 N.Y.2d 568, mot for rearg den 14 N.Y.2d 689; People v Ebron, 116 Misc.2d 774). In any event, the record establishes that Nassau County's assertion of jurisdiction in the instant matter was proper (CPL 20.40, subd 1, par [a]; People v Botta, 100 A.D.2d 311). Lazer, J.P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Amato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 29, 1984
101 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Amato

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARL AMATO, JOHN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 29, 1984

Citations

101 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Pirone

We find no merit to defendant's contention with respect to the issuance of the eavesdropping warrant.…

People v. Mattina

Judgment affirmed. Defendant, by his plea of guilty, waived his right to challenge the geographical…