Opinion
D062206
05-30-2013
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALFONSO ALVARADO, Defendant and Appellant.
Cynthia A. Grimm, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
(Super. Ct. No. SCS252155)
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Kathleen M. Lewis, Judge. Affirmed.
Cynthia A. Grimm, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant Alfonso Alvarado pled guilty to one count of forcibly committing a lewd act on a person under the age of 14 and admitted that at the time of the offense he was over the age of 16. (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (b)(1); Welf. & Inst. Code, § 707, subd. (d)(1).) In exchange for the plea, the district attorney agreed to dismiss one count of sodomy by force on a person under the age of 14 (Pen. Code, § 286, subd. (c)(2)(A) & (B)) and four other counts of forcible lewd acts on a person under the age of 14. Alvarado stipulated to a sentencing range of from five to 10 years.
At sentencing, the victim, who is Alvarado's cousin, submitted a statement describing his continuing trauma, and the victim's psychologist submitted a statement in which he described the victim's continuing and irreparable harm. Although Alvarado submitted statements from a number of family members and other individuals in mitigation, the trial court imposed the upper term of 10 years in state prison.
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel lists as a possible, but not arguable, issue:
Whether the trial court abused its discretion in imposing the upper term.
We granted Alvarado permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded. Our review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issue listed pursuant to Anders v. California, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues.
We find that Alvarado was adequately represented both at trial and on appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
BENKE, Acting P. J. WE CONCUR:
McDONALD, J.
O'ROURKE, J.