From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alston

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 7, 2016
145 A.D.3d 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

12-07-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Douglas ALSTON, appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, NY (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).


Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, NY (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), rendered January 30, 2012, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

The Supreme Court was required to determine on the record whether the defendant, whose conviction for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree constituted an armed felony (see CPL 1.20[41] ; Penal Law §§ 70.02 [1] [b] ; 265.03[3] ), was an “eligible youth” (see CPL 720.10[2], [3] ) and, if so, whether or not he should be afforded youthful offender status (see People v. Middlebrooks, 25 N.Y.3d 516, 519, 14 N.Y.S.3d 296, 35 N.E.3d 464 ; People v. Rudolph, 21 N.Y.3d 497, 501, 974 N.Y.S.2d 885, 997 N.E.2d 457 ). Here, the record does not demonstrate that the court made that determination. Accordingly, we vacate the defendant's sentence, and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing after making this determination. We express no opinion as to whether the court should afford youthful offender status to the defendant.

RIVERA, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Alston

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 7, 2016
145 A.D.3d 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Alston

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Douglas ALSTON, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 7, 2016

Citations

145 A.D.3d 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
145 A.D.3d 737
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8243

Citing Cases

People v. Thompson

CPL 720.20(1) requires "that there be a youthful offender determination in every case where the defendant is…

People v. Thompson

CPL 720.20(1) requires "that there be a youthful offender determination in every case where the defendant is…