From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Agudelo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 14, 1991
177 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

November 14, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.).


We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v. Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918.)

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Kupferman, Kassal and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Agudelo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 14, 1991
177 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Agudelo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SOCCORRO AGUDELO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 14, 1991

Citations

177 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)