From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Abbott

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
Mar 9, 2022
No. 2022-01460 (N.Y. App. Div. Mar. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2022-01460 Ind. 71/19

03-09-2022

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Anthony J. Abbott, appellant.

Thomas N. N. Angell, Poughkeepsie, NY (Jennifer Burton of counsel), for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.


Thomas N. N. Angell, Poughkeepsie, NY (Jennifer Burton of counsel), for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.

BETSY BARROS, J.P. ANGELA G. IANNACCI CHERYL E. CHAMBERS LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Edward T. McLoughlin, J.), rendered March 13, 2020, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, since he did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground or otherwise raise this issue before the County Court (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Headley, 197 A.D.3d 1329). In any event, contrary to the defendant's contention, the record reveals that he was, in fact, advised during the plea allocution that the promised sentence would run consecutively to a term of imprisonment he was already serving. Thus, the record demonstrates that his plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.

The defendant's contention that an appeal waiver was imposed by the County Court as a condition of the plea agreement, without having been requested by the People, is not supported by the plea minutes (see People v Winfield, 173 A.D.3d 1228). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248).

The defendant's remaining contentions are similarly foreclosed by his valid appeal waiver.

BARROS, J.P., IANNACCI, CHAMBERS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Abbott

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
Mar 9, 2022
No. 2022-01460 (N.Y. App. Div. Mar. 9, 2022)
Case details for

People v. Abbott

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Anthony J. Abbott…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Mar 9, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-01460 (N.Y. App. Div. Mar. 9, 2022)