From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. $20,110 United States Currency

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division
Jun 28, 2007
No. B191821 (Cal. Ct. App. Jun. 28, 2007)

Opinion


Page 182b

152 Cal.App.4th 182b __ Cal.Rptr.3d__ THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. $20,110 UNITED STATES CURRENCY, Defendant RICKY C. HILL, Defendant and Appellant. B191821M California Court of Appeal, Second District, Sixth Division June 28, 2007

San Luis Obispo County, Super. Ct. No. CV050753.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 4, 2007, (151 Cal.Ap..4th 1022; __Cal.Rptr.3d__). be modified as follows:

1. On page 3 [151 Cal.App.4th 1025, advance report, 2d full par., line 4], third paragraph, the second sentence is modified to read as follows:

Section 11488.4, subdivision (i)(2), requires the district attorney to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the $20,110 currency is traceable to drug trafficking as set forth in section 11470, subdivision (f).

Section 11470, subdivision (f) reads as follows: "All moneys, negotiable instruments, securities, or other things of value furnished or intended to be furnished by any person in exchange for a controlled substance, all proceeds traceable to such an exchange, and all moneys, negotiable instruments, or securities used or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of Section 11351, 11351.5, 11352, 11355, 11359, 11360, 11378, 11378.5, 11379, 11379.5, 11379.6, 11380, 11382, or 11383 of this code, or Section 182 of the Penal Code, or a felony violation of Section 11366.8 of this code, insofar as the offense involves manufacture, sale, possession for sale, offer for sale, or offer to manufacture, or conspiracy to commit at least one of those offenses, if the exchange, violation, or other conduct which is the basis for the forfeiture occurred within five years of the seizure of the property, or the filing of a petition under this chapter, or the issuance of an order of forfeiture of the property, whichever comes first."

2. On page 3 [151 Cal.App.4th 1025, advance report, 2d full par., line 14], the last paragraph that continues to the top of page 4, add a final sentence as follows:

We use the word "nexus" to mean "traceable to" or "having a connection with."

There is no change in the judgment.


Summaries of

People v. $20,110 United States Currency

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division
Jun 28, 2007
No. B191821 (Cal. Ct. App. Jun. 28, 2007)
Case details for

People v. $20,110 United States Currency

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. $20,110 UNITED STATES CURRENCY…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division

Date published: Jun 28, 2007

Citations

No. B191821 (Cal. Ct. App. Jun. 28, 2007)