From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex rel. Wayne C.J. v. McCulloch

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Mar 11, 2022
No. 2022-01625 (N.Y. App. Div. Mar. 11, 2022)

Opinion

2022-01625

03-11-2022

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. WAYNE C.J., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. DEBORAH MCCULLOCH, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CENTRAL NEW YORK PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

KATHRYN F. HARTNETT, UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (LAURA ETLINGER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.


KATHRYN F. HARTNETT, UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (LAURA ETLINGER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., NEMOYER, CURRAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Gerard J. Neri, J.), entered June 22, 2020 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking habeas corpus relief with respect to his civil commitment to Central New York Psychiatric Center pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10. In appeal No. 1, petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition. In appeal No. 2, petitioner appeals from an order denying his motion for leave to reargue his petition.

In appeal No. 1, petitioner challenges the initiation of the Mental Hygiene Law article 10 proceeding against him and the use of certain evidence at that proceeding. We reject that challenge and agree with Supreme Court that" 'the article 10 proceeding itself is the proper forum for petitioner to challenge the validity of the... underlying article 10 petition'" and proceeding (People ex rel. Charles B. v McCulloch, 155 A.D.3d 1559, 1561 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 906 [2018]). Thus, habeas corpus relief does not lie (see People ex rel. Quartararo v Demskie, 238 A.D.2d 792, 793-794 [3d Dept 1997], lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 802 [1997]).

With respect to appeal No. 2, we dismiss petitioner's appeal because no appeal lies from an order denying leave to reargue (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 A.D.2d 983, 984 [4th Dept 1990]).


Summaries of

People ex rel. Wayne C.J. v. McCulloch

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Mar 11, 2022
No. 2022-01625 (N.Y. App. Div. Mar. 11, 2022)
Case details for

People ex rel. Wayne C.J. v. McCulloch

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. WAYNE C.J.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 11, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-01625 (N.Y. App. Div. Mar. 11, 2022)

Citing Cases

People ex rel. Wayne C.J. v. McCulloch

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. Same memorandum as in People ex…