In People v. Thompson, 122 Mich. 411, 425 (1899), the Court was confronted with the issue of whether it is "proper for the purpose of proving one act of negligence, to show other acts of negligence upon prior occasions."
Summary of this case from Crane v. WoodburyJuly Term, 1899.
Proceedings confirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. All concurred.
In People v. Thompson, 122 Mich. 411, 425 (1899), the Court was confronted with the issue of whether it is "proper for the purpose of proving one act of negligence, to show other acts of negligence upon prior occasions."
Summary of this case from Crane v. WoodburyFull title:The People of the State of New York ex rel. Harry L. Thompson and Another…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jul 1, 1899
For more than a century several of our sister states have held the rule of grand jury secrecy inviolate and…
State v. FalconeSee, also, State v. Campbell, 73 Kan. 688, 85 P. 784 (1906); State v. Mageske, 119 Or. 312, 249 P. 364…