From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Singleton v. Deegan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1969
31 A.D.2d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

January 27, 1969


In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 17, 1968, which dismissed the writ. Judgment modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto that the dismissal of the writ is without prejudice to the relator raising the same issues on his appeal from the judgment of conviction in the County Court, Nassau County, rendered December 18, 1967, which appeal is pending in this court. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. Appellant was convicted of attempted forgery in the second degree in the County Court, Nassau County, on his plea of guilty. Judgment of resentence thereon was rendered on December 18, 1967. A notice of appeal from that judgment was filed. Instead of perfecting that appeal, appellant instituted this habeas corpus proceeding to test issues which are a proper subject of appeal from the judgment of conviction. There is no reason of practicality or necessity to depart from the orderly judicial process of appeal ( People ex rel. Keitt v. McMann, 18 N.Y.2d 257). Brennan, Acting P.J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Singleton v. Deegan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1969
31 A.D.2d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Singleton v. Deegan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. THOMAS SINGLETON, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 1969

Citations

31 A.D.2d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Thomas v. Deegan

In view of the pendency of relator's appeal from the judgment of conviction and from the denial of his coram…

People ex Rel. Glover v. Casscles

Judgment affirmed, without costs. We affirm dismissal of the writ on the ground that no reason of…