From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Rosevale Realty Co. v. Kleinert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1922
204 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

Opinion

December, 1922.


Although we think that the superintendent of the bureau of buildings has no power or discretion to refuse a permit on the ground that the proposed building violates a restrictive covenant, as this is not a matter for him to decide, yet, in view of the fact that this court has issued an injunction prohibiting the petitioner from constructing the building in question, we have decided to affirm this order, without prejudice to an application to be made after the vacation or termination of the injunction. Order affirmed, without costs. Blackmar, P.J., Rich, Kelly, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Rosevale Realty Co. v. Kleinert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1922
204 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Rosevale Realty Co. v. Kleinert

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. ROSEVALE REALTY COMPANY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1922

Citations

204 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

Citing Cases

Mtr. of G.M.L. Land Corp. v. Foley

The law is well settled that when a use is permissible in a specific use district by the existing zoning law,…

Vandoros v. Hatzimichalis

Therefore, Trial Term erred in directing Hatzimichalis to restore the easement to its original condition. The…