From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Parker v. Hasenauer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 17, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 777 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Submitted May 4, 1984

Decided May 17, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, John P. Balio, J.

Paul R. Shanahan and Frank Policelli for appellant.

Barry M. Donalty, District Attorney ( Michael E. Daley of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The denial of bail in this case was based upon the determination that defendant, if released on bail, would be likely to flee the jurisdiction. This determination was reached after consideration of the nature of the offense, the unusually large amount of drugs and money involved, the probability of conviction and the possible severity of sentence. Inasmuch as said denial is supported by the record, it is an exercise of discretion resting on a rational basis and thus beyond correction in habeas corpus. ( People ex rel. Parone v Phimister, 29 N.Y.2d 580).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Parker v. Hasenauer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 17, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 777 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Parker v. Hasenauer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. EDWARD A. PARKER, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 17, 1984

Citations

62 N.Y.2d 777 (N.Y. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Wesley Bednowsky

Considering, among other things, "[t]he nature of the offense, probability of conviction, and severity of the…

People v. Mohammed

(People ex rel. Calloway v Skinner, 33 N.Y.2d 23.) The grant or denial of bail rests within the discretion of…