From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Pangburn v. Hodges

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2001
281 A.D.2d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 21, 2001.

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, D'Amico, J. — Habeas Corpus.

PRESENT: GREEN, J. P., WISNER, HURLBUTT AND BURNS, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Because the contentions raised in the petition "could have been raised on direct appeal or pursuant to CPL article 440, habeas corpus is not an appropriate remedy" ( People ex rel. Batista v. Walker, 198 A.D.2d 865, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 752). The remaining contentions in petitioner's appellate brief were not raised in the petition and therefore are not properly before us ( see, People ex rel. McWhinney v. Smith, 219 A.D.2d 879; People ex rel. Morgan v. Berry, 149 A.D.2d 752).


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Pangburn v. Hodges

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2001
281 A.D.2d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Pangburn v. Hodges

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. MARK B. PANGBURN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 21, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 211

Citing Cases

People v. Irvin

Supreme Court properly denied the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Habeas corpus is not an appropriate…

People ex Rel. Victory v. Travis

Thus, that evidence may be used at petitioner's final parole revocation hearing. The contention of petitioner…