From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. N.Y. Central Hudson River Rd. v. Purdy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 23, 1915
111 N.E. 1097 (N.Y. 1915)

Opinion

Argued November 17, 1915

Decided November 23, 1915

George H. Walker, Crosby J. Beakes and Alexander S. Lyman for appellant.

William H. King, Addison B. Scoville and Lamar Hardy for respondents.


Order of Appellate Division reversed, with costs, and that of Special Term affirmed, upon the dissenting opinion of SCOTT, J., below.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, CARDOZO, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. N.Y. Central Hudson River Rd. v. Purdy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 23, 1915
111 N.E. 1097 (N.Y. 1915)
Case details for

People ex Rel. N.Y. Central Hudson River Rd. v. Purdy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 23, 1915

Citations

111 N.E. 1097 (N.Y. 1915)
111 N.E. 1097

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Ortenberg v. Bales

" The conclusion reached was that as "no footings were put in until November 1st, 1926," the building could…

People v. Simmons

That even the last Legislature did not regard the fourth offender life term as other than discretionary is…