From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Gainance v. Platt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 28, 1911
148 App. Div. 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

Opinion

December 28, 1911.

James R. Stevens, Jr., and Rollin B. Sanford, for the appellant.

John S. Wolfe, for the respondent.


The theory of the county judge seems to have been that the judgment was illegal and excessive because it included the provision "at hard labor." Section 171 of the Prison Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 43; Laws of 1909, chap. 47) provides that "the superintendent of State prisons, the superintendents, managers and officials of all reformatories and penitentiaries in the State, shall, so far as practicable, cause all the prisoners in said institutions, who are physically capable thereof, to be employed at hard labor, for not to exceed eight hours of each day, other than Sundays and public holidays."

It is evident, therefore, that the provision in the judgment of conviction for hard labor did not increase the punishment and was not in excess of the jurisdiction or power of the court. That such a provision cannot render the judgment void or be reviewed on habeas corpus is too plain a proposition to admit of argument. It may also be observed that the conviction was valid and the relator was not entitled to be discharged because in the information the crime of petit larceny was not charged as a first offense. It was held in People v. Cook (45 Hun, 34) that it was not essential to the jurisdiction of a court of Special Sessions in a case of petit larceny that the information or the warrant should allege that the crime charged is a first offense The same doctrine was asserted in People v. Johnston ( 112 App. Div. 812) where Mr. Justice CHESTER said: "If it be a first offense in fact, the court has jurisdiction to try the case, and it is to be deemed a first offense unless the contrary is charged." It follows that the order discharging the relator should be reversed, the writ dismissed and the relator remanded to the sheriff of Albany county, and the judgment of conviction carried into effect.

All concurred, except SMITH, P.J., not voting.

Order discharging relator reversed and writ dismissed, and relator remanded to custody of sheriff of Albany county that the judgment of conviction may be carried into effect.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Gainance v. Platt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 28, 1911
148 App. Div. 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Gainance v. Platt

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. EDWARD GAINANCE, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 28, 1911

Citations

148 App. Div. 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
132 N.Y.S. 939

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Pettibone v. Supt. Elmira Reformatory

The offense charged "is to be deemed a first offense unless the contrary is charged." ( People v. Cook, 45…

People ex Rel. Newman v. Foster

(Cf. People ex rel. Sloane v. Lawes, 255 N.Y. 112, 116; People ex rel. Gainance v. Platt, 148 App. Div. 579,…