Opinion
February 16, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Sullivan County (Kane, J.).
We find no reason to disagree with Supreme Court's dismissal of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus. It is well settled that a habeas corpus proceeding is not applicable where full relief may be obtained through other more appropriate means. In the absence of proof warranting a departure from traditional orderly procedures, Supreme Court properly dismissed petitioner's request for habeas corpus relief.
Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.