From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex rel. Douglas v. Apple

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 24, 2015
134 A.D.3d 1358 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

12-24-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Keith DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. Craig D. APPLE, as Sheriff of Albany County, Respondent.

Keith Douglas, Comstock, appellant pro se.


Keith Douglas, Comstock, appellant pro se.

Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court (Lynch, J.), dated March 28, 2014 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, after a hearing.

Following his arrest on drug-related charges, petitioner commenced this habeas corpus proceeding seeking his immediate release. In view of petitioner being subsequently indicted, Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding as moot. This appeal ensued.

The decision of Supreme Court was never reduced to a judgment or order. "As a general rule, no appeal lies except from a judgment or an order" ( People ex rel. Frazier v. Fogg, 122 A.D.2d 377, 377, 504 N.Y.S.2d 794 [1986] ; see CPLR 5501 ). In any event, once petitioner was indicted, he was no longer entitled to the relief requested in his habeas corpus application (see People ex rel. Miller v. Knowlton, 239 A.D.2d 655, 655–656, 657 N.Y.S.2d 369 [1997] ; People ex rel. Warren v. Davis, 92 A.D.2d 679, 679, 460 N.Y.S.2d 378 [1983] ). ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

LAHTINEN, J.P., EGAN JR., ROSE and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People ex rel. Douglas v. Apple

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 24, 2015
134 A.D.3d 1358 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People ex rel. Douglas v. Apple

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Keith DOUGLAS, Appellant, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 24, 2015

Citations

134 A.D.3d 1358 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
21 N.Y.S.3d 650
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 9572

Citing Cases

People v. Sheehan

ORDERED that the motion for permission to proceed as a poor person is granted, without costs, only to the…