From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Cook v. Pitts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 19, 1906
111 App. Div. 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)

Opinion

January 19, 1906.

George Addington, District Attorney, and Robert H. McCormic, Assistant District Attorney, for the appellant.

Edward J. Brennan and Mark Cohn, for the respondent.


This case is governed by the rule in People ex rel. Bidwell v. Pitts ( 111 App. Div. 319), decided at this term of court. The certificate uses the words "having thereupon pleaded guilty, it is adjudged," etc., while the statutory form (Code Crim. Proc. §§ 721, 722) uses the words "having been thereupon duly convicted upon a plea of guilty, it is adjudged," etc., but it has been held this is a substantial compliance with the statutory form, as upon a plea of guilty the only duty of the court is to sentence. ( People ex rel. Evans v. McEwen, 67 How. Pr. 105, 112, 113.)

The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, the writ of habeas corpus quashed and the relator remanded to the custody of said sheriff as custodian of said penitentiary to serve the balance of his term.

All concurred.

Order reversed, writ of habeas corpus quashed, and relator remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Albany county, as custodian of the penitentiary, to serve balance of his term.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Cook v. Pitts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 19, 1906
111 App. Div. 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Cook v. Pitts

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. RUDOLPH COOK, Respondent, v …

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 19, 1906

Citations

111 App. Div. 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
97 N.Y.S. 511

Citing Cases

People v. Rosenthal

A plea of guilty is tantamount to a conviction. ( People ex rel. Cook v. Pitts, 111 A.D. 321; People ex rel.…