From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennsylvania Co. for Banking Trusts v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nov 13, 1950
185 F.2d 125 (3d Cir. 1950)

Opinion

No. 10289.

Argued November 7, 1950.

Decided November 13, 1950.

Elizabeth B. Davis, Washington, D.C. (Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Sp. Asst., to the Atty. Gen., Gerald A. Gleeson, U.S. Atty., Thomas J. Curtin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Philip M. Hammett, Philadelphia, Pa. (C. Walter Randall, Jr., Saul, Ewing, Remick Saul, Philadelphia, on the brief), for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.


This case presents the question whether United States bonds owned by a non-resident alien but physically present in this country at the time of the alien's death are to be included in the decedent's gross estate and subject to federal estate tax. The District Court, following the Second Circuit decision in Jandorf's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1948, 171 F.2d 464, held that the bonds were not to be considered in measuring the estate tax. D.C.E.Pa. 1950, 91 F. Supp. 237.

We agree with the District Court and with the Second Circuit. The question is a close one. All the points considered for and against the imposition of the tax were thoroughly considered in the Second Circuit opinion and, in turn, incorporated in the opinion of the District Court. We do not think that anything we can say can add to the very thorough discussion which the narrow problem has already received.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Pennsylvania Co. for Banking Trusts v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nov 13, 1950
185 F.2d 125 (3d Cir. 1950)
Case details for

Pennsylvania Co. for Banking Trusts v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:PENNSYLVANIA CO. FOR BANKING TRUSTS v. UNITED STATES

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Nov 13, 1950

Citations

185 F.2d 125 (3d Cir. 1950)

Citing Cases

Hartford-Connecticut Tr. Co. v. United States

We think they did. This case was followed in Claflin v. Com'r Int. Rev., 2 Cir., 186 F.2d 307; Chemical Bank…

Haffner v. United States

Jandorf has been followed by the Third Circuit and the Tax Court. See Pennsylvania Co. for Banking Trusts v.…