From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennington v. Lucas

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 27, 1992
599 So. 2d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-00024.

May 27, 1992.

Petition for review from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, J. Rogers Padgett, J.

James B. Loper, Tampa, for petitioners.

Jeanne L. Coleman, Tampa, for respondent.


The Board of Trustees of the City Pension Fund for Firefighters and Police Officers of the City of Tampa, Florida (Board) seek review of a circuit court order that granted James S. Lucas' petition for writ of certiorari and directed that the Board approve Lucas' application for disability retirement. Lucas had applied for disability retirement after suffering a line of duty injury which precluded his return to his former duties as a police officer.

We deny the writ because the circuit court afforded procedural due process and applied the correct law. City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1982). We agree with the circuit court that the Board's decision was not based on substantial competent evidence. The three doctors of the Board's medical review committee all agreed that Lucas was disabled. The sole evidence upon which the Board based its decision was a report from one of the three doctors that acknowledged the injury yet contained unsupported conclusions that Lucas' injury was not permanent. The remaining evidence before the Board supported Lucas' application for disability retirement.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and HALL and BLUE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pennington v. Lucas

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 27, 1992
599 So. 2d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Pennington v. Lucas

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. PENNINGTON, DAVID V. KEENE, SCOTT CUNNINGHAM, GEORGE PENNINGTON…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 27, 1992

Citations

599 So. 2d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)