Pennington-Thurman v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Full title: Wilma PENNINGTON-THURMAN, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: May 22, 2018

556 S.W.3d 68 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105981

05-22-2018

Wilma PENNINGTON-THURMAN, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: Wilma Pennington-Thurman, Acting Pro Se, P.O. Box 771201, St. Louis, MO 63177. FOR RESPONDENT: Brian C. Walsh, Tiffani L. Lightle, One Metropolitan Square, 211 North Broadway, Ste. 3600, St. Louis, MO 63102.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT: Wilma Pennington-Thurman, Acting Pro Se, P.O. Box 771201, St. Louis, MO 63177.

FOR RESPONDENT: Brian C. Walsh, Tiffani L. Lightle, One Metropolitan Square, 211 North Broadway, Ste. 3600, St. Louis, MO 63102.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.Wilma Pennington-Thurman ("Appellant"), acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying her motion to reopen two actions for fraud and wrongful foreclosure, both of which were finally decided in 2010. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).