From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penn v. Warden of Kern Valley State Prison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2022
1:18-cv-01482-AWI-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2022)

Opinion

1:18-cv-01482-AWI-HBK (PC)

09-27-2022

MARLIN PENN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN OF KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON, ET. AL., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. NOS. 48, 52)

Plaintiff Marlin Penn is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302.

On June 8, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending the denial of Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. Doc. No. 52 at 1-5. The findings and recommendations served on Plaintiff provided him fourteen days to file objections. Id. at 1, 5. Plaintiff did not file objections and the time for doing so has now passed. See docket.

Consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court concludes the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

ORDER

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on June 8, 2022 (Doc. No. 52) are ADOPTED in full; and,
2. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 48) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Penn v. Warden of Kern Valley State Prison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2022
1:18-cv-01482-AWI-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Penn v. Warden of Kern Valley State Prison

Case Details

Full title:MARLIN PENN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN OF KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON, ET. AL.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2022

Citations

1:18-cv-01482-AWI-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2022)