From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penn v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Nov 12, 2010
Case Number: 1:09cv395 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2010)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:09cv395.

November 12, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on July 21, 2010 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14). Subsequently, the petitioner filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, a review of the docket indicates that petitioner has neither sought nor received permission of the Court of Appeals to file the petition. Therefore, the petition in this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter. Since reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, the petitioner will be denied any requested certificate of appealability and the Court will certify that any appeal would not be taken in objective good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Penn v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Nov 12, 2010
Case Number: 1:09cv395 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Penn v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Case Details

Full title:Markco Penn, Petitioner(s), v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Nov 12, 2010

Citations

Case Number: 1:09cv395 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2010)