From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penland v. Golden

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Nov 5, 1951
107 Cal.App.2d 256 (Cal. Ct. App. 1951)

Opinion

Docket No. 18357.

November 5, 1951.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County sustaining demurrer to complaint with leave to amend. Arnold Praeger, Judge. Appeal from order dismissed.

Elledge R. Penland, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Major Tenner and Jack Tenner for Respondents.


[1] This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint with leave to amend. As an appeal does not lie from such an order, but only from a judgment entered thereon we are without jurisdiction to review the case on its merits. ( Cornic v. Stewart, 179 Cal. 242 [ 176 P. 164].) Accordingly, we are required on our own motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

White, P.J., and Doran, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Penland v. Golden

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Nov 5, 1951
107 Cal.App.2d 256 (Cal. Ct. App. 1951)
Case details for

Penland v. Golden

Case Details

Full title:ELLEDGE R. PENLAND, Appellant, v. NATHAN GOLDEN et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: Nov 5, 1951

Citations

107 Cal.App.2d 256 (Cal. Ct. App. 1951)
236 P.2d 823

Citing Cases

CARLEY v. CITY OF SANTA ROSA

It has been uniformly held that a reviewing court is without jurisdiction to entertain a purported appeal…