From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penigar v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 12, 2012
Case No. CV 11-6805-JFW (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-6805-JFW (SPx)

04-12-2012

Bryant Penigar, Plaintiff, v. County of San Bernardino, et al., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the Court in its Order dated April 12, 2012 having dismissed Plaintiff Bryant Penigar's first claim for relief with prejudice;

WHEREAS, the Court in its Order dated April 12, 2012 having granted Defendant County of San Bernardino's motion for summary judgment based on its determination that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all claims for relief alleged against it;

IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that:

1. Judgment is hereby entered against Plaintiff Bryant Penigar, through Faye Porter, guardian ad litem, on his first and second claims for relief in this action; and

2. Defendant County of San Bernardino shall recover from Plaintiff its costs of suit in the sum of $ ___.

The Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment.

______________________

JOHN F. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Penigar v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 12, 2012
Case No. CV 11-6805-JFW (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Penigar v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

Case Details

Full title:Bryant Penigar, Plaintiff, v. County of San Bernardino, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 12, 2012

Citations

Case No. CV 11-6805-JFW (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2012)

Citing Cases

Me2 Prods., Inc. v. Doe

Id. Dec. 7, 2015), adopted, 2016 WL 126352 (D. Id. Jan. 11, 2016) (dismissing claims); Houser v. Ryan, 2015…