From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penesa v. Cal. Inst. for Women

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 7, 2022
EDCV 16-01878 JWH (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2022)

Opinion

EDCV 16-01878 JWH (RAO)

12-07-2022

MANISHA L. PENESA, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

JOHN W. HOLCOMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to the Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge entered substantially contemporaneously herewith and the August 28, 2018, Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice with respect to Defendant Shawn Brown.
2. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice with respect to Defendants Edward Wamil, David Lopez, Michael Martel, Kimberly Hughes, and Rebecca Reyes.
3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Penesa v. Cal. Inst. for Women

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 7, 2022
EDCV 16-01878 JWH (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Penesa v. Cal. Inst. for Women

Case Details

Full title:MANISHA L. PENESA, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 7, 2022

Citations

EDCV 16-01878 JWH (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2022)