From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pendleton v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 1, 2009
Civil Case No. 2:09-cv-00028 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 1, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 2:09-cv-00028.

April 1, 2009


Order


This is one of a series of actions plaintiff Sammy Lee Pendleton, a federal prisoner, has filed alleging that he is unlawfully held in prison. He styled this action a prisoner civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter is before the Court on Pendleton's March 20, 2009 objections (doc. 12) to Magistrate Judge Abel's February 2, 2009 Report and Recommendation on initial screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and (b) and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c) that the complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim (doc. 5).

Upon de novo review as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the Court OVERRULES plaintiff's objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.

Pendleton has been determined by Judge James L. Graham to be incompetent to stand trial for bank robbery. 18 U.S.C. § 4241(b). He wants out of prison. His remedy is through the criminal case. Judge Graham is now in the process of determining whether Pendleton should be released from custody or must be held longer. 18 U.S.C. § 4246(a). United States v. Samuel Lee Pendleton, 2:07-cr-181 (S.D. Ohio) (doc. 34). That is his sole remedy at this time.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.


Summaries of

Pendleton v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 1, 2009
Civil Case No. 2:09-cv-00028 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 1, 2009)
Case details for

Pendleton v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Sammy Lee Pendleton, Petitioner v. United States of America, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 1, 2009

Citations

Civil Case No. 2:09-cv-00028 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 1, 2009)