From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pender v. Waldenmayer

Court of Appeal of California
Oct 30, 2008
D051680 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2008)

Opinion

D051680

10-30-2008

GISELE PENDER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NORBERT WALDENMAYER et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Not to be Published


THE COURT:

The opinion in this case is hereby modified as follows:

1. Delete the sentence beginning on page 13, line 8, and replace it with the following:

Finally, the court relied on the contractual requirement that the improvements would be made by the Developers only" subsequent to and subject to tentative map approvals" (language that the Residents drafted) as additional evidence of the parties intent that the Developers were obligated to improve the road to City standards in effect at the time the Improvement Agreement was signed.


Summaries of

Pender v. Waldenmayer

Court of Appeal of California
Oct 30, 2008
D051680 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Pender v. Waldenmayer

Case Details

Full title:GISELE PENDER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NORBERT WALDENMAYER et al.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California

Date published: Oct 30, 2008

Citations

D051680 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2008)