From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pembleton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Oct 31, 2000
30 S.W.3d 250 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED77263

Filed: October 31, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, HONORABLE EDWARD D. HODGE

Daniel H. Mohs, 4387 Laclede Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63108, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, John Munson Morris, III, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO 65102 and Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Paul J. Simon and Sherri B. Sullivan, JJ.

ORDER



Movant, Kenneth Pembleton, appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Paul J. Simon, J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., concurring.


Summaries of

Pembleton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Oct 31, 2000
30 S.W.3d 250 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Pembleton v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH PEMBLETON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Oct 31, 2000

Citations

30 S.W.3d 250 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)